Hello world!

July 17th, 2010

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Russia Blog Roundup – Thanksgiving Weekend

November 29th, 2008

Before we get into the best posts of the week, some blog news:

  • The Power Vertical is a new blog by Brian Whitmore and Robert Coalson, two jouranlists at RFE/RL.  Brian and Robert have only been blogging for a couple of weeks, but already they’re packed TPV with excellent content .  This definitely looks like a blog to bookmark / add to your RSS reader.
  • Da Russophile has moved and renamed – please redirect your bookmarks to Sublime Oblivion.
  • Robert Amsterdam has a shiny new look.

Now this week’s top blog posts:

OK.  That’s it for this week.  If you celebrate Thanksgiving (or even if you don’t) – have a great weekend!

Save money – be smelly like Zhirinovsky

November 27th, 2008

Russian loony Far Right leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky has been setting working hard to save his roubles in the current financial crisis.

Clearly no fan of personal hygeine, he explains his money saving regime:

“I have been thrifty. I am not having my hair cut. My hair has already grown longer than ever. I only shave every other day. I eat very little. I never go out. I never invite anyone over to my place. I don’t buy presents for anyone and I am asking people not to buy anything for me. I am not travelling anywhere,” he said.

Zhirinovskiy also said there was no need to spend money on personal hygiene products because “all these are chemical and hazardous”. Fewer newspapers should be bought because the same newspaper can be shared “by all next-door neighbours” or perhaps “the entire block”, he continued.

(Via Johnson’s Russia List 2008 ~215)

If he follows this policy though, I’m not sure how well he’s going to be able to implement his Christmas policy:

“As for Christmas celebrations, there is no need to travel abroad or to go to a restaurant. Stay in Moscow, stay at home or invite yourself over to someone else’s place.”

Good old Vlad. If he wasn’t such an unpleasant (and now smelly) man I’d say something like “Gotta love him”. I wouldn’t invite him over for Christmas, though. Even if he washed specially.

PS – Vlad’s also reckons Russia should rename its President as “Supreme Ruler”

Andrew Lloyd Webber and Putin – Eurovision Duet

November 25th, 2008

Phantom of the Opera RussiaOf all the exciting things Vladimir Putin has to do, nothing compares with meeting Andrew Lloyd Webber, the maestro behind Phantom of the Opera and Britain’s next Eurovision Song Contest Entry.

British theatre magazine The Stage reports:

According to ALW’s own website: “The two men met at Prime Minister Putin’s dacha. They spoke for nearly an hour about a wide range of serious matters, including Russia’s relationship with Europe, its relationship with the UK, as well as the Eurovision Song Contest.”

[...]Elaine Bedell, BBC controller of entertainment commissioning said (we’re not making this up): “This was an historic meeting – Andrew Lloyd Webber meets Prime Minster Putin – to discuss the UK’s prospects in Eurovision.”

Apparently Putin – who shall henceforth be known in Russia as ‘Putin the Traitor’ and in England as ‘Putin the Beloved But Tone Deaf’ – has promised Lloyd Webber that he’ll personally pick up the phone and vote for Britain instead of Russia in this year’s song contest.

Business New Europe (BNE) cut prices

November 21st, 2008

BNEJust a quick note to let you know that BNE (Business New Europe) have cut prices for access to their content.

Full access to the website is now €30 ($38) per year, and access to their Russian email list is €40 ($50) per year.

BNE set up a few years ago, and describe themselves as:

“the only magazine covering business, economics, finance and politics in the dynamic new markets of central, eastern and southeast Europe.”

From what I’ve seen BNE’s reporting and analysis is high quality – certainly, their articles regularly appear in Johnson’s Russia List. If you’re interested in business in Russia or Eastern Europe, this could be bargain.

If you’re curious, BNE are offering a month’s free trial to new users. I had a free trial a year or so back, and found it really useful but, at the time, couldn’t justify the price. I’m tempted to reconsider.

(PS – before you ask – I am absolutely not being paid to write nice things about BNE!!)

Georgia war – both sides bad

November 19th, 2008

At last! A report that recognises that both Russia and Georgia did some pretty shocking things during the war in August.

The report said that in attacking Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital, on Aug. 7 and 8, Georgia fired Grad missiles that seemed to miss their targets and hit civilian areas. It also criticized Russia for bombarding Georgian territory later and for allowing South Ossetian forces to loot ethnic Georgian villages for weeks.

Both sides, the report concludes, used cluster bombs.

Hooray for Amnesty International. Boo for war.

About time.

Robert Amsterdam 2.0

November 19th, 2008

Check out the new look Robert Amsterdam 2.0 – very swish.

Robert Amsterdam 2.0

I really like the new look. If nothing else it’s inspired a huge boost in productivity – a stunning 18 posts appeared yesterday! I’m very curious about the new category headings across the top of the page though – does this mean that Robert Amsterdam will be writing less about Russia in the future? I hope not!

Russia Blog Roundup – 16 November

November 16th, 2008

Before I kick of this week’s best posts, I wanted to point you in the direction of Misha’s Russia Blog.  Scroll down to the Gorbachev Obama post for the coolest picture of the week.

Now, on to this week’s roundup:

Well that’s it for this week.  If you can’t wait for next week’s installment, be sure to check out the Russia Blogs page over at my new website Russian News Online.

Does Ukraine hold the key to Russia's future?

November 14th, 2008

World Policy JournalThe MIT World Policy Journal is celebrating its 25th anniversary by making access to its Fall 2008 journal for free until the end of November.

The 25th anniversary issue looks ahead to the next 25 years and, in Russia’s Rotting Empire, Nina L Khrushcheva (yes – before you ask – she’s Nikita Kruschev’s great-granddaughter) has penned a look at Russia’s next quarter century.

It’s an interesting article overall, but there were two things I found particularly interesting.

First – Khrushcheva’s view that political change in Russia is cyclical:

“…periods of ‘remission’ (a retreat from total dictatorship) or reforms, and periods of ‘oppression’ or stability have alternated consistently in the last century…”

I do agree, but wonder – if we accept that Russia is in the early stages of a period of “oppression”, how deep will it go, and how long will it be before the next about turn that leads towards reform. Are we in for many more years of sliding towards authoritarianism and a strong Russian state, or will the more frantic pace of globalisation speed up the Russian political cycle?

The second point, which I found intriguing given the disdain with which many Russians view Ukraine (and the fact that Khrushchev was a Ukrainian), was Khrushcheva’s argument that Ukraine could hold the key to Russia’s future.

“Russians know that Ukrainians are the same as them, a people similar in their culture and mentality. If they have made their choice, why can’t we do the same? Thus, if Ukraine succeeds over the next 25 years, it may herald the political death of Putinism.

[...]The best way to help Russia today is to help Ukraine over the coming decades support its claim that it belongs within the European fold, among European institutions.”

Ukraine is at a bit of a cross roads at the moment, and seems like it could go either way. It is clearly an ideal target for both European / US and Russian foreign policy, and I’d imagine it’s going to be a hell of a cultural and political battleground in the coming years. But I have no idea what direction Ukraine will take.

What do you think? Who will come out on top in Ukraine? Will the next couple of years in Kiev set the tone for the next couple of decades in Moscow?

What if the Romanovs had been restored?

November 12th, 2008

Martin Gilbert, writing in the Times, imagines an entirely different end to the First World War:

Imagine: in October 1918, Lloyd George’s Cabinet is planning for a prolonged struggle in 1919. Haig’s solution promises to avoid a confrontation even bloodier than the Somme or Passchendaele. The Government agrees. Germany’s main condition is to keep the vast swath of Russia that her troops have occupied since the Bolshevik revolution and the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March.

With peace made with Germany on Haig’s terms by mid-October, the British troops already in Russia have a German ally to help them to crush what Churchill calls “the foul baboonery of Bolshevism”.

Gilbert goes on to observe that Germany would probably still start a second war at some stage – probably with France, because there would be no Polish and Czechosolvak states for Germany to expand into. And, rather hopefully, he suggests that a newly restored Imperial Russia would repay its war debts to Britain, allowing Britain to build a postwar build a postwar cuontry “fit for heroes”.

But nothing about how a restored Romanov dynasty would survive in the new-old Russia.

So, I thought I’d throw a few thoughts – questions really – of my own out there.

Let’s imagine that an Immperial Romanov Dynasty has retained control of the Kremlin with the help of a motley alliance of Russian Whites, and British and German troops. How widely would they be accepted by the Russian public, two years after a pair of revolutions, and at the end of a brief civil war?

On the plus side, they’d presumably have physical control of the apparatus of state, and be backed by foreign money and troops if necessary in the short term. If they could bring some measure of stability, they would presumably be able to count of some gratitude from the public at large.

But, on the down side, they’d be trying to re-establish the divine right of the Romanovs to rule over a people that had experienced (albiet not very succesfully) self rule. The Bolsheviks might have been vanquished, but left-leaning opposition groups would presumably still exist and have at least some measure of support among the people. And how many of the middle classes would have been inspired by the prospect of Kerensky’s failed provisional government?

Also – how would the Americans influence the new-old Russia? If the United States had been able to play a significant role, wouldn’t they have insisted on some pretty significant democratic reforms in Russia? Or would they have been marginalised by an Anglo-German axis?

Being so reliant on British and German support would also post real problems for the Russian government. Britain especially would want Russia to repay its debts, which would be a strain on the public finances – not entirely desirable in a country shattered by years of brutal warfare. If political favours are also asked of Russia, would this reduce the government to a puppet in the eyes of its people?

Lots of questions, I know. Anyone want to take a stab at answering some of them in the comments below?