<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Russia Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/</link>
	<description>The Russia Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleeting guest</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>fleeting guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>I stumbled upon this blog through a search for something else (I live in Siberia) and wow--wow.  I had read this link (Top 5) and looked at LR which is just sad--so much anger and misplaced hatred--imagine what good that negative energy could accomplish if it weren&#039;t so tainted by ego and so bent on fueling further negativity.  Then I thought I&#039;d read the comments here and I see that ego prevails in so many of the postings.  It&#039;s not uncommon, I guess--and, truth be told, there was a day when I would have also engaged in such indignant, self-righteous rhetoric.  However, I learned that its productive value is so limited and that it mostly turns people off (which is the case with me now).  Not everyone has done this here, but enough have for me to know that this is not a place I&#039;ll seek thoughtful discourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled upon this blog through a search for something else (I live in Siberia) and wow&#8211;wow.  I had read this link (Top 5) and looked at LR which is just sad&#8211;so much anger and misplaced hatred&#8211;imagine what good that negative energy could accomplish if it weren&#8217;t so tainted by ego and so bent on fueling further negativity.  Then I thought I&#8217;d read the comments here and I see that ego prevails in so many of the postings.  It&#8217;s not uncommon, I guess&#8211;and, truth be told, there was a day when I would have also engaged in such indignant, self-righteous rhetoric.  However, I learned that its productive value is so limited and that it mostly turns people off (which is the case with me now).  Not everyone has done this here, but enough have for me to know that this is not a place I&#8217;ll seek thoughtful discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicu Popescu &#187; cai troieni si alte publicatii</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicu Popescu &#187; cai troieni si alte publicatii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>[...] prescurtata a ideilor deja exprimate pe blog. mai vedeti un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prescurtata a ideilor deja exprimate pe blog. mai vedeti un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicu Popescu &#187; vizele poloneze pentru ucraineni: un model pentru romania</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicu Popescu &#187; vizele poloneze pentru ucraineni: un model pentru romania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] in deplina conformitate cu acquis-ul comunitar. vedeti un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light. si revista rusa Profil cu o editie speciala despre Transnistria. am mai scris despre sarkozy si [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in deplina conformitate cu acquis-ul comunitar. vedeti un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light. si revista rusa Profil cu o editie speciala despre Transnistria. am mai scris despre sarkozy si [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicu Popescu &#187; vizele poloneze pentru ucraineni: un model pentru romania</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicu Popescu &#187; vizele poloneze pentru ucraineni: un model pentru romania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>[...] un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light. si revista rusa Profil cu o editie speciala despre Transnistria. am mai scris despre sarkozy si [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light. si revista rusa Profil cu o editie speciala despre Transnistria. am mai scris despre sarkozy si [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicu Popescu &#187; vizele poloneze pentru ucraineni: un model pentru romania</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicu Popescu &#187; vizele poloneze pentru ucraineni: un model pentru romania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>[...] romania va anula vizele de tranzit pentru cetatenii RM cu vize schengen. (am mai scris multi si bine despre asta, inclusiv aici si aici). obiectivul 1 e atins. urmatorul pas: romania trebuie sa liberalizeze mai departe regimul de calatorii pentru cetatenii R. Moldova invatand sa utilizeze la maxim flexibilitatea acquis-ului schengen de la Polonia. Polonia (care a intrat in spatiul schengen acum o luna si ceva, iar in UE acum 4 ani) acorda automat permise de munca pentru 6 luni cetatenilor ucrainei. deasemenea acorda permise de lucru automat 3 din 6 luni cetatenilor rusi si belarusi. deci regimul de vize si emigrare aplicat de catre polonia ucrainei (si belarusului si rusiei) - este mai favorabil decat cel aplicat de catre Romania fata de RM. Normal ca regimul de vize a Poloniei este in concordanta cu legislatia comunitara. Prin urmare Romania poate &#8220;flexibiliza&#8221; si mai mult regimulor de vize pentrui cetatenii RM, in deplina conformitate cu acquis-ul comunitar. vedeti un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] romania va anula vizele de tranzit pentru cetatenii RM cu vize schengen. (am mai scris multi si bine despre asta, inclusiv aici si aici). obiectivul 1 e atins. urmatorul pas: romania trebuie sa liberalizeze mai departe regimul de calatorii pentru cetatenii R. Moldova invatand sa utilizeze la maxim flexibilitatea acquis-ului schengen de la Polonia. Polonia (care a intrat in spatiul schengen acum o luna si ceva, iar in UE acum 4 ani) acorda automat permise de munca pentru 6 luni cetatenilor ucrainei. deasemenea acorda permise de lucru automat 3 din 6 luni cetatenilor rusi si belarusi. deci regimul de vize si emigrare aplicat de catre polonia ucrainei (si belarusului si rusiei) &#8211; este mai favorabil decat cel aplicat de catre Romania fata de RM. Normal ca regimul de vize a Poloniei este in concordanta cu legislatia comunitara. Prin urmare Romania poate &#8220;flexibiliza&#8221; si mai mult regimulor de vize pentrui cetatenii RM, in deplina conformitate cu acquis-ul comunitar. vedeti un post util despre top 5 russia blogs pe siberian light  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Kolya contributed to the stupidity with at least one of his comments for sure.

For others besides himself, it was okay for him to term Russia Blog as &quot;propaganda&quot;, as uncritical praise was heaped on another blog.

When legitimate criticism was raised of that other blog, it was simplistically categorized as a &quot;bash&quot; followed by a series of disingenuous personal attacks.

It&#039;s worth repeating that all of Chris Doss&#039; posts here were of a purely crank nature. Also note the silence of those who seemngly try to give the appearance of being responsible.

Once again, I&#039;ve no criticisms of Andy on the conduct of this thread. Unlike other moderators/hosts, he hasn&#039;t come in to take a questionable side (put mildly) over the other. One can either be an even handed disciplinaraian or take a completely laissez faire approach. The overtly biased moderator/host isn&#039;t a positive quality.

At this thread, links were posted where intelligent discussion could be found. The purpose of trolling can be to either eliminate the participation of a source for political reasons and-or to get a perverse kind of cheap thrill by saying stupidly negative remarks against an individual or individuals. Such a scenario is akin to the crank caller to a talk radio show. Caller id systems and the 7 second delay have mostly eliminated that as an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kolya contributed to the stupidity with at least one of his comments for sure.</p>
<p>For others besides himself, it was okay for him to term Russia Blog as &#8220;propaganda&#8221;, as uncritical praise was heaped on another blog.</p>
<p>When legitimate criticism was raised of that other blog, it was simplistically categorized as a &#8220;bash&#8221; followed by a series of disingenuous personal attacks.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth repeating that all of Chris Doss&#8217; posts here were of a purely crank nature. Also note the silence of those who seemngly try to give the appearance of being responsible.</p>
<p>Once again, I&#8217;ve no criticisms of Andy on the conduct of this thread. Unlike other moderators/hosts, he hasn&#8217;t come in to take a questionable side (put mildly) over the other. One can either be an even handed disciplinaraian or take a completely laissez faire approach. The overtly biased moderator/host isn&#8217;t a positive quality.</p>
<p>At this thread, links were posted where intelligent discussion could be found. The purpose of trolling can be to either eliminate the participation of a source for political reasons and-or to get a perverse kind of cheap thrill by saying stupidly negative remarks against an individual or individuals. Such a scenario is akin to the crank caller to a talk radio show. Caller id systems and the 7 second delay have mostly eliminated that as an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kolya</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Kolya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>In his blog, Marginal Revolution, economist Tyler Cowen titled one of his posts, &quot;Does the quality of blog comments deteriorate?&quot;. Excerpt of the post:

&quot;I often have the impression that the best comments come in the first fifteen or so, after which quality declines precipitously and often exponentially.  Why might that be?

1. The truly smart people only like to make smart points on &quot;fresh&quot; posts.  For instance more people read the comments on fresh posts (but why?), so the benefit of a quality comment is lower as the post becomes older.

2. As time passes, the chance that a warring twosome find each other, and take over the thread, increases.

3. There is a tendency to attack or respond to the stupidest or most controversial thing said, and the longer the comments thread runs for, the stupider this will get.

4. As the number of comments multiplies, so does the number of independent discussion threads and the optimal number of threads is exceeded.&quot;

To read the whole thing, go to:

http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2008/02/does-the-qualit.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his blog, Marginal Revolution, economist Tyler Cowen titled one of his posts, &#8220;Does the quality of blog comments deteriorate?&#8221;. Excerpt of the post:</p>
<p>&#8220;I often have the impression that the best comments come in the first fifteen or so, after which quality declines precipitously and often exponentially.  Why might that be?</p>
<p>1. The truly smart people only like to make smart points on &#8220;fresh&#8221; posts.  For instance more people read the comments on fresh posts (but why?), so the benefit of a quality comment is lower as the post becomes older.</p>
<p>2. As time passes, the chance that a warring twosome find each other, and take over the thread, increases.</p>
<p>3. There is a tendency to attack or respond to the stupidest or most controversial thing said, and the longer the comments thread runs for, the stupider this will get.</p>
<p>4. As the number of comments multiplies, so does the number of independent discussion threads and the optimal number of threads is exceeded.&#8221;</p>
<p>To read the whole thing, go to:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2008/02/does-the-qualit.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2008/02/does-the-qualit.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s conclusively. This is what happens when you correspond with people of dreck ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s conclusively. This is what happens when you correspond with people of dreck ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>He lies again by ignoring what I said on the matter. Vintage trolling.

Moreover, he isn&#039;t aware of my financial situation which in any event is none of his sorry ass business.

&quot;Kremlin fuck-ups&quot;? (his words). Actually, I&#039;ve discussed them. His apparent learning disability prevents him from acknowledging them. It could be a combination of that and just carrying on like a disingenuous troll, who knowingly skirts certain particulars.

Whatever the case, he has conculsively shown himself to be an absolute flop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He lies again by ignoring what I said on the matter. Vintage trolling.</p>
<p>Moreover, he isn&#8217;t aware of my financial situation which in any event is none of his sorry ass business.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kremlin fuck-ups&#8221;? (his words). Actually, I&#8217;ve discussed them. His apparent learning disability prevents him from acknowledging them. It could be a combination of that and just carrying on like a disingenuous troll, who knowingly skirts certain particulars.</p>
<p>Whatever the case, he has conculsively shown himself to be an absolute flop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GER O'BRIEN</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/top-5-russia-blogs/comment-page-3/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>GER O'BRIEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/28/top-5-russia-blogs/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Mike,
I lost nothing here. You couldnt account for Russia&#039;s mistake in invading Chechnya and your&#039;re just an apologist for Kremlin fuck-ups, and an unpaid one at that. It&#039;ll be great to see you interviewed on Russia today. I dont like to see your distortions go uncorrected, hence my coming on here with you. You are - to use one of your own words - a buttmunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I lost nothing here. You couldnt account for Russia&#8217;s mistake in invading Chechnya and your&#8217;re just an apologist for Kremlin fuck-ups, and an unpaid one at that. It&#8217;ll be great to see you interviewed on Russia today. I dont like to see your distortions go uncorrected, hence my coming on here with you. You are &#8211; to use one of your own words &#8211; a buttmunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

