<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russia &#039;wins&#039; British Council battle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/</link>
	<description>The Russia Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Good reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/mary-dejevsky/mary-dejevsky-if-its-back-to-the-cold-war-it-may-be-our-fault-771719.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/mary-dejevsky/mary-dejevsky-if-its-back-to-the-cold-war-it-may-be-our-fault-771719.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/mary-dejevsky/mary-dejevsky-if-its-back-to-the-cold-war-it-may-be-our-fault-771719.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack @ Tech Teapot</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack @ Tech Teapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>@Aleks - Russia murdered a British citizen on British soil using nuclear material. You are very quick to point out faults with American and UK policy, which is fine. I don&#039;t see you criticising Russia for such a brazen assassination. The UK is entitled to feel very aggrieved with Russia&#039;s recent behaviour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aleks &#8211; Russia murdered a British citizen on British soil using nuclear material. You are very quick to point out faults with American and UK policy, which is fine. I don&#8217;t see you criticising Russia for such a brazen assassination. The UK is entitled to feel very aggrieved with Russia&#8217;s recent behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I always find it a bit disturbing when the Brits bleat on about &#039;international law&#039; being on their side. Have they already forgotten that when &#039;international law&#039; does not suit their purposes, they invent most imaginative circumelocutions and excuses to ignore it....

It&#039;s bizarre that they decided to pick this fight. They gambled that Putin would not want to up the stakes and keep certain Russo-British affairs separate (i.e. that it would not affect trade or BP), but they seem to have forgotten that Putin is a spy (once a spy, always a spy) and has on a number of occasions pulled rabbits out of hats. Always being &#039;predictable&#039; does not necessarily server &#039;his&#039; interests being so would make him easier to deal with. Only look at how the Chinese are dealing with the US calls for &#039;greater clarity&#039; about their &#039;military intentions&#039;! It&#039;s certainly not the Chinese military who are moving and projecting their forces/power West..

I don&#039;t think this has too much to do with the upcoming elections
either. Putin drew his red lines and is showing that he is prepared to push back. NATO and the West have already pushed too far towards Russia for Russia&#039;s comfort. On a more local level, it seems to be a question of respecting Russia&#039;s sovereignty, something which the West seems to respect less and less, especially those who are not &#039;allies&#039;.

The whole episode was dumb and there was absolutely no reason for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find it a bit disturbing when the Brits bleat on about &#8216;international law&#8217; being on their side. Have they already forgotten that when &#8216;international law&#8217; does not suit their purposes, they invent most imaginative circumelocutions and excuses to ignore it&#8230;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bizarre that they decided to pick this fight. They gambled that Putin would not want to up the stakes and keep certain Russo-British affairs separate (i.e. that it would not affect trade or BP), but they seem to have forgotten that Putin is a spy (once a spy, always a spy) and has on a number of occasions pulled rabbits out of hats. Always being &#8216;predictable&#8217; does not necessarily server &#8216;his&#8217; interests being so would make him easier to deal with. Only look at how the Chinese are dealing with the US calls for &#8216;greater clarity&#8217; about their &#8216;military intentions&#8217;! It&#8217;s certainly not the Chinese military who are moving and projecting their forces/power West..</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this has too much to do with the upcoming elections<br />
either. Putin drew his red lines and is showing that he is prepared to push back. NATO and the West have already pushed too far towards Russia for Russia&#8217;s comfort. On a more local level, it seems to be a question of respecting Russia&#8217;s sovereignty, something which the West seems to respect less and less, especially those who are not &#8216;allies&#8217;.</p>
<p>The whole episode was dumb and there was absolutely no reason for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red exile</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Red exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I think Siberian Light and these commentators are spot on.  For spin-obsessed New Labour, it has played out very nicely for the message their want to deliver to domestic audiences while, in truth, having no strategic come-back on themselves.  But I do think UK-Russo relations are going to get worse, not better, and some more nastiness is on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Siberian Light and these commentators are spot on.  For spin-obsessed New Labour, it has played out very nicely for the message their want to deliver to domestic audiences while, in truth, having no strategic come-back on themselves.  But I do think UK-Russo relations are going to get worse, not better, and some more nastiness is on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I agree that, once Russia began to play hardball, the British Council never had a chance of winning this dispute.

You simply cannot keep your offices open in another country if that country&#039;s government really wants them closed.

But I suspect that the Council, as well as the British Government, recognised that from the outset.  Instead, they wanted to publicly make the point that they felt they had done nothing wrong.

I think they always knew that they would &#039;lose&#039; this battle, in the sense that the offices would close. Instead, they were aiming for a PR victory on the international stage.

Whether they have achieved that or not, I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that, once Russia began to play hardball, the British Council never had a chance of winning this dispute.</p>
<p>You simply cannot keep your offices open in another country if that country&#8217;s government really wants them closed.</p>
<p>But I suspect that the Council, as well as the British Government, recognised that from the outset.  Instead, they wanted to publicly make the point that they felt they had done nothing wrong.</p>
<p>I think they always knew that they would &#8216;lose&#8217; this battle, in the sense that the offices would close. Instead, they were aiming for a PR victory on the international stage.</p>
<p>Whether they have achieved that or not, I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle &#38; Svet</title>
		<link>http://siberianlight.net/russia-wins-british-council-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle &#38; Svet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siberianlight.net/2008/01/17/russia-wins-british-council-battle/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Britain Should have never opened back up after being told to keep the doors closed. Then this would never have become a well published victory for Russia! Britain by trying to play hardball in the first place just gave up chance of a diplomatic work around. They also put the Moscow branch in big jeopardy of being shut done also.

Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain Should have never opened back up after being told to keep the doors closed. Then this would never have become a well published victory for Russia! Britain by trying to play hardball in the first place just gave up chance of a diplomatic work around. They also put the Moscow branch in big jeopardy of being shut done also.</p>
<p>Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

