Comments on: "Medvedveda" – Clinton mangles Medvedev

By: GER O'BRIEN

GER O'BRIEN — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:54:31 +0000

Is it just me or is Hilary Clinton a really unpleasant person? It looks like she might get the nomination after all.

As for her mistake, she might have just as well said ‘Putin’ rather than Medvedeva or whatever. There’s no difference anyway:-)

By: Michael Averko

Michael Averko — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:44:48 +0000

On the subject of those two:

Medvedev, Hillary and �Media Bias�
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12462

By: Heribert Schindler

Heribert Schindler — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:56:33 +0000

“But, not wanting to make a complete twat of himself on his first outing, probably won�t.”

Yeah, sure ! Not only Russian politics are predictable, Mr Newman

By: Tim Newman

Tim Newman — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:50:50 +0000

And Dima might think / say something like this �

But, not wanting to make a complete twat of himself on his first outing, probably won’t.

By: “Most Russians do not love Putin per se, but they love Putin�s Russia.” : Sean’s Russia Blog

Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:06:49 +0000

[...] name in a similar context in which Bush had to learn Musharaf’s.� You can see a clip of of Hillary’s verbal stumbling on Siberian Light.� (Btw, Andy has also be doing some live [...]

By: Heribert Schindler

Heribert Schindler — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:27:04 +0000

And Dima might think / say something like this …

“I have no doubt that as the president of the Russian Federation, even though technically the meetings would be with the person labelled as ‘President of the USA’, the decisions will be made by oil companies, “contractors” and the “industrial military complex.�

Russian politics is much more predictable than US politics, what you see is what you get. US politics is more like “why should I worry about the crap I say today when I can turn 180 degrees anytime I care to do so ?”.